Who are the viable possibilities for social conservatives in 2012?
It's really hard to tell.George Will was on Meet the Press, saying it could be Obama, Daniels, or Pawlenty. Do you agree?
I don't think it's an implausible possibility that Tim Pawlenty could win.
But I don't think that's a given by any chance.
There are plausible scenarios where Romney could the the nominee. And I think there's a reasonable amount of evidence that he would be a social conservative.
The way that Trump talks about being a prolifer is so hard to believe.
People are talking about Mitch Daniels, but he's driving people crazy, including myself, by talking about calling a truce on social issues.
It could be a chaotic primary. It could also wind up being a fairly mundane primary.
No, I don't.Is there value of Herman Cain being in the race?
I think Pawlenty is very plausible. I think Daniels, if he got in could be plausible too.
I sort of worry that a Chris Christie candidacy could be like a Fred Thompson candidacy.
I wouldn't be as confident as George Will, saying it would be Pawlenty or Daniels, though I think that's plausible.
I predicted before the debate started that he'd win, and that's how it turned out.
There's just a serious experience problem.
He's a good man, a successful businessman. Nothing hurt by having him in the mix.
Rick Santorum, I think, adds a lot to the race. I don't know if he's going to win in the end, but he brings up issues that others wouldn't normally deal with.
No comments:
Post a Comment